There are probably 9 people in the US who fully understand the healthcare debate. The question isn’t whether you “like” Obama or the healthcare law. The question isn’t whether you think healthcare is good or bad. The question isn’t whether your costs will go up or down. The question is whether Congress, in passing the law, acted within its authority. I haven’t read the law, nor do I plan to. As I understand the primary issues, the Supreme Court was considering whether Congress could pass the law under the Commerce Clause powers, which apparently it cannot, or the power to tax, which apparently it can. Can you speak articulately on the Commerce Clause or Congress’ power to levy taxes? No? Perhaps you should consider the wisdom of spouting off about this law if a) you don’t understand the role of the judiciary in the 3 branches of government or b) you don’t understand the Commerce Clause or Congress’ power to tax. If you want to throw around opinions because you don’t like the President (or apparently the super conservative Chief Justice who wrote the majority opinion, supporting the law), fine, but acknowledge your opinion for what it is…a condemnation of ideas which really aren’t relevant to whether the law is constitutional or not. I thought so many people were concerned about “judicial activism.” Well, here 5 justices didn’t confuse their opinions for the law…they assessed the law. Another test — if you haven’t read any part of the Constitution, haven’t read the Bill of Rights, can’t name at least a majority of the Justices, and you spend your nights keeping up with the Kardashians, perhaps you should let people who know a little more than you wax philosophical about major constitutional issues.
– Andrew Goldner